Authentification abonné
lvbmsap
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 29 / Numéro 3-4 (Octobre 2017) BMSAP, 29 3-4 (2017) 140-149 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
BMSAP
Volume 29, Numéro 3-4, Octobre 2017
Page(s) 140 - 149
Section Article / Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s13219-017-0185-x
Publié en ligne 20 juin 2017
  • Lieverse AR, Bazaliiskii VI, Goriunova OI, et al (2009) Upper limb musculoskeletal stress markers among middle Holocene foragers of Siberia's Cis-Baikal region. Am J Phys Anthropol 138:458–72 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lieverse AR, Bazaliiskii VI, Goriunova OI, et al (2013) Lower limb activity in the Cis-Baikal: Entheseal changes among middle Holocene Siberian foragers. Am J Phys Anthropol 150:421–32 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jurmain R, Alves Cardoso F, Henderson C, et al (2012) Bioarchaeology's Holy Grail: The reconstruction of activity. In: Grauer A (ed) A companion to paleopathology. Wiley/Blackwell, Chichester, UK pp 531–42 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Villotte S, Assis S, Cardoso FA, et al (2016) In search of consensus: terminology for entheseal changes (EC). Int J Paleopathol 13:49–55 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hawkey DE, Merbs CF (1995) Activity-induced musculoskeletal stress markers (MSM) and subsistence strategy changes among ancient Hudson Bay Eskimos. Int J Osteoarchaeol 5:324–38 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peterson J (1998) The Natufian hunting conundrum: Spears, atlatls, or bows? Musculoskeletal and armature evidence. Int J Osteoarchaeol 8:378–89 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weiss E (2007) Muscle markers revisited: Activity pattern reconstruction with controls in a central California Amerind population. Am J Phys Anthropol 133:931–40 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benjamin M, Kumai T, Milz S, et al (2002) The skeletal attachment of tendons – Tendon “entheses.” Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Mol Integr Physiol 133:931–45 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Benjamin M, McGonagle D (2001) The anatomical basis for disease localisation in seronegative spondyloarthropathy at entheses and related sites. J Anat 199:503–26 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benjamin M, Moriggl B, Brenner E, et al (2004) The “enthesis organ” concept: Why enthesopathies may not present as focal insertional disorders. Arthritis Rheum 50:3306–13 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McGonagle D (2005) Imaging the joint and enthesis: Insights into pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 64(suppl 2):ii58–ii60 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Villotte S, Knüsel CJ (2013) Understanding entheseal changes: Definition and life course changes. Int J Osteoarchaeol 23:135–46 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alves Cardoso F, Henderson CY (2010) Enthesopathy formation in the humerus: Data from known age-at-death and known occupation skeletal collections. Am J Phys Anthropol 141:550–60 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Alves Cardoso F, Henderson CY (2013) The categorisation of occupation in identified skeletal collections: a source of bias? Int J Osteoarchaeol 23:186–96 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cunha E, Umbelino C (1995) What can bones tell about labour and occupation: the analysis of skeletal markers of occupational stress in the Identified Skeletal Collection of the Anthropological Museum of the University of Coimbra (preliminary results). Antropol Port 13:49–68 [Google Scholar]
  • Henderson CY, Mariotti V, Pany-Kucera D, et al (2013) Recording specific entheseal changes of fibrocartilaginous entheses: initial tests using the Coimbra method. Int J Osteoarchaeol 23:152–62 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Henderson CY, Nikita E (2015) Accounting for multiple effects and the problem of small sample sizes in osteology: A case study focussing on entheseal changes. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 8:805–17 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mariotti V, Facchini F, Belcastro MG (2004) Enthesopathies – Proposal of a standardized scoring method and applications. Coll Antropol 28:145–59 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mariotti V, Facchini F, Belcastro MG (2007) The study of entheses: Proposal of a standardised scoring method for twenty-three entheses of the postcranial skeleton. Coll Antropol 31:291–313 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mariotti V, Milella M, Belcastro MG (2009) Musculoskeletal stress markers (MSM): methodological reflections. In: Santos AL, Alves Cardoso F, Assis S, Villotte S (eds) Workshop in musculoskeletal stress markers (MSM): Limitations and achievements in the reconstruction of past activity patterns Coimbra, July 2–3, 2009. Abstract book. Department of Anthropology University of Coimbra CIAS, p 28. http://www.uc.pt/en/cia/msm/Oral_Mariotti [Google Scholar]
  • Michopoulou E, Nikita E, Valakos ED (2015) Evaluating the efficiency of different recording protocols for entheseal changes in regards to expressing activity patterns using archival data and cross-sectional geometric properties. Am J Phys Anthropol 158:557–68 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Milella M, Belcastro MG, Zollikofer CPE, et al (2012) The effect of age, sex, and physical activity on entheseal morphology in a contemporary Italian skeletal collection. Am J Phys Anthropol 148:379–88 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hashimoto T, Nobuhara K, Hamada T (2003) Pathologic evidence of degeneration as a primary cause of rotator cuff tear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415:111–20 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hess GW (2010) Achilles tendon rupture: A review of etiology, population, anatomy, risk factors, and injury prevention. Foot Ankle Spec 3:29–32 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stovitz SD, Johnson RJ (2006) “Underuse” as a cause for musculoskeletal injuries: Is it time that we started reframing our message? Br J Sports Med 40:738–9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Henderson CY, Mariotti V, Pany-Kucera D, et al (2016) The new “Coimbra Method”: A biologically appropriate method for recording specific features of fibrocartilaginous entheseal changes. Int J Osteoarchaeol 25:925–32 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Henderson CY, Wilczak C, Mariotti V (2016) Commentary: An update to the new Coimbra method for recording entheseal changes. Int J Osteoarchaeol [in press] [Google Scholar]
  • Rocha MA (1995) Les collections ostéologiques humaines identifiées du Musée Anthropologique de l'Université de Coimbra. Antropol Port 13:7–38 [Google Scholar]
  • Cardoso FA (2008) A portrait of gender in two 19th and 20th century Portuguese populations: A palaeopathological perspective. PhD thesis, Durham University, 359 p [Google Scholar]
  • Henderson CY (2008) When hard work is disease: The interpretation of enthesopathies. In: Brickley M, Smith M (eds) Proceedings of the eighth annual conference of the british association for biological anthropology and osteoarchaeology. British Archaeological Reports: International Series, Oxford, pp 17–23 [Google Scholar]
  • Minagawa H, Itoi E, Konno N, et al (1998) Humeral attachment of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons: an anatomic study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 14:302–6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilczak CA, Mariotti V, Pany-Kucera D, et al (2017) Training and interobserver reliability in qualitative scoring of skeletal samples. J Archaeol Sci Rep 11:69–79 [Google Scholar]
  • Christensen RHB (2015) Ordinal: regression models for ordinal data. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ordinal/index.html [Google Scholar]
  • Mangiafico SS (2015) An R companion for the handbook of biological statistics, version 1.09. Available from: rcompanion.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, et al (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA [Google Scholar]
  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32 [Google Scholar]
  • Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by random forest. R News 2:18–22 [Google Scholar]
  • Villotte S, Castex D, Couallier V, et al (2010) Enthesopathies as occupational stress markers: Evidence from the upper limb. Am J Phys Anthropol 142:224–34 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Abreu M, Chung C, Mendes L, et al (2003) Plantar calcaneal enthesophytes: New observations regarding sites of origin based on radiographic, MR imaging, anatomic, and paleopathologic analysis. Skeletal Radiol 32:13–21 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thurston AJ (2002) Bone spurs: mechanism of production of different shapes based on observations in Dupuytren's diathesis. ANZ J Surg 72:290–3 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kullar JS, Randhawa GK, Kullar KK (2014) A study of calcaneal enthesophytes (spurs) in Indian population. Int J Appl basic Med Res 4:S13–6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Menz HB, Zammit GV, Landorf KB, et al (2008) Plantar calcaneal spurs in older people: longitudinal traction or vertical compression? J Foot Ankle Res 1:7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kumai T, Benjamin M (2002) Heel spur formation and the subcalcaneal enthesis of the plantar fascia. J Rheumatol 29:1957–64 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benjamin M, Toumi H, Suzuki D, et al (2007) Microdamage and altered vascularity at the enthesis-bone interface provides an anatomic explanation for bone involvement in the HLA-B27-associated spondylarthritides and allied disorders. Arthritis Rheum 56:224–33 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shaw HM, Benjamin M (2007) Structure–function relationships of entheses in relation to mechanical load and exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:303–15 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.