Authentification abonné
lvbmsap
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 31 / Numéro 1-2 (Avril 2019) BMSAP, 31 1-2 (2019) 52-59 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
BMSAP
Volume 31, Numéro 1-2, Avril 2019
La variabilité morphologique en paléoanthropologie : de nouvelles approches, de nouveaux enjeux ?
Page(s) 52 - 59
Section Note / Note
DOI https://doi.org/10.3166/bmsap-2019-0060
Publié en ligne 19 avril 2019
  • Martin L (1985) Significance of enamel thickness in hominoid evolution. Nature, 314(6008):260–3 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lucas PW, Constantino P, Wood B, Lawn B (2008) Dental enamel as a dietary indicator in mammals. BioEssays, 30(4):374–85 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pampush JD, Duque AC, Burrows BR, et al (2013) Homoplasy and thick enamel in primates. J Hum Evol, 64(3):216–24 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kay RF (1981) The nut-crackers – a new theory of the adaptations of the Ramapithecinae. Am J Phys Anthropol, 55(2):141–51 [Google Scholar]
  • Daegling DJ, McGraw WS, Ungar PS, et al (2011) Hard-Object Feeding in Sooty Mangabeys (Cercocebus atys) and Interpretation of Early Hominin Feeding Ecology. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e23095 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Maas MC (1991) Enamel structure and microwear: An experimental study of the response of enamel to shearing force. Am J Phys Anthropol, 85(1):31–49 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Teaford MF, Maas MC, Simons EL (1996) Dental microwear and microstructure in early oligocene primates from the Fayum, Egypt: Implications for diet. Am J Phys Anthropol, 101(4):527–43 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rabenold D, Pearson OM (2011) Abrasive, silica phytoliths and the evolution of thick molar enamel in primates, with implications for the diet of Paranthropus boisei. PLoS ONE, 6(12): e28379 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Olejniczak AJ, Smith TM, Skinner MM, et al (2008) Threedimensional molar enamel distribution and thickness in Australopithecus and Paranthropus. Biol Lett, 4(4):406–10 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ungar PS, Hlusko LJ (2016) The evolutionary path of least resistance. Science, 353(6294):29–30 [Google Scholar]
  • Żądzińska E, Kurek M, Borowska-Strugińska B, et al (2013) The effect of the season of birth and of selected maternal factors on linear enamel thickness in modern human deciduous incisors. Arch Oral Biol, 58(8):951–63 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kato A, Tang N, Borries C, et al (2014) Intra- and interspecific variation in macaque molar enamel thickness. Am J Phys Anthropol, 155(3):447–59 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Macho GA, Berner ME (1993) Enamel thickness of human maxillary molars reconsidered. Am J Phys Anthropol, 92(2):189–200 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schwartz GT (2000) Taxonomic and functional aspects of the patterning of enamel thickness distribution in extant largebodied hominoids. Am J Phys Anthropol, 111(2):221–24 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kono RT, Suwa G, Tanijiri T (2002) A three-dimensional analysis of enamel distribution patterns in human permanent first molars. Arch Oral Biol, 47(12):867–75 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kono RT (2004) Molar enamel thickness and distribution patterns in extant great apes and humans: new insights based on a 3-dimensional whole crown perspective. Anthropol Sci, 112 (2):121–46 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Koenigswald W, Rensberger JM, Pretzschner HU (1987) Changes in the tooth enamel of early Paleocene mammals allowing increased diet diversity. Nature, 328(6126):150–152 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bajaj D, Arola DD (2009) On the R-curve behavior of human tooth enamel. Biomaterials, 30(23-24):4037–46 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Olejniczak AJ, Smith TM, Wang W, et al (2008). Molar enamel thickness and dentine horn height in Gigantopithecus blacki. Am J Phys Anthropol, 135(1):85–91 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vogel ER, van Woerden JT, Lucas PW, et al (2008) Functional ecology and evolution of hominoid molar enamel thickness: Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii and Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii. J Hum Evol, 55(1):60–74 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Macchiarelli R, Mazurier A, Illerhaus B, Zanolli C (2009) Ouranopithecus macedoniensis (Mammalia, Primates, Hominoidea): virtual reconstruction and 3D analysis of a juvenile mandibular dentition (RPl-82 and RPl-83). Geodiversitas, 31(4):851–63 [Google Scholar]
  • Smith TM, Olejniczak AJ, Martin LB, Reid DJ (2005) Variation in hominoid molar enamel thickness. J Hum Evol, 48(6):575–92 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith TM, Olejniczak AJ, Reh S, et al (2008) Brief communication: Enamel thickness trends in the dental arcade of humans and chimpanzees. Am J Phys Anthropol, 136(2):237–41 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zanolli C, Dean C, Rook L, et al (2016) Enamel thickness and enamel growth in Oreopithecus: Combining microtomographic and histological evidence. CR Palevol, 15(1):209–26 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zanolli C, Bayle P, Bondioli L, et al (2017) Is the deciduous/permanent molar enamel thickness ratio a taxon-specific indicator in extant and extinct hominids? CR Palevol, 16(5):702–14 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Englisch LM, Kostrzewa K, Kopke S, et al (2017) Uneven distribution of enamel, dentine and cementum in cheek teeth of domestic horses (Equus caballus): A micro computed tomography study. PLOS ONE, 12(8):e0183220 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Winkler DE, Kaiser TM (2015) Structural Morphology of Molars in Large Mammalian Herbivores: Enamel Content Varies between Tooth Positions. PLOS ONE, 10(8):e0135716 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kono RT, Suwa G (2008) Enamel Distribution Patterns of Extant Human and Hominoid Molars: Occlusal versus lateral enamel thickness. Bull Natl Mus Nat Sci, Ser D, 34:1–9 [Google Scholar]
  • Guy F, Gouvard F, Boistel R, et al (2013) Prospective in (primate) dental analysis through tooth 3D topographical quantification. PLoS ONE, 8(6):e66142 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thiery G, Lazzari V, Ramdarshan A, Guy F (2017) Beyond the map: enamel distribution characterized from 3D dental topography. Front Physiol, 8:524 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Strahler AN (1952) Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. GSA Bulletin, 63(11):1117–42 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lucas PW, Gaskins JT, Lowrey TK, et al (2012) Evolutionary optimization of material properties of a tropical seed. J Roy Soc Interface, 9(66):34–42 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scott EC (1979) Dental wear scoring technique. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 51(2):213–17 [Google Scholar]
  • Lazzari V, Guy F (2014) Quantitative three-dimensional topography in taxonomy applied to the dental morphology of catarrhines. Bull Mém Soc Anthropol Paris, 26(3–4):140–6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guy F, Lazzari V, Gilissen E, Thiery G (2015) To what extent is primate second molar enamel occlusal morphology shaped by the enamel-dentine junction? PLoS ONE, 10(9):e0138802 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Google Scholar]
  • Schlager S (2017) Morpho and Rvcg – Shape Analysis in R. In: Zheng G, Li S, Szekely G (eds), Statistical Shape and Deformation Analysis. Academic Press, pp 217–56 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Macho GA, Jiang Y, Spears IR (2003) Enamel microstructure—a truly three-dimensional structure. J Hum Evol, 45(1):81–90 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lucas PW, Teaford MF (1994) Functional morphology of colobine teeth. In: Davies G, Oates J (eds) Colobine monkeys: their ecology, behaviour and evolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 173–203 [Google Scholar]
  • Smith TM, Kupczik K, Machanda Z, et al (2012) Enamel thickness in Bornean and Sumatran orangutan dentitions. Am J Phys Anthropol, 147(3):417–26 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Suwa G, Kono RT, Simpson SW, et al (2009) Paleobiological Implications of the Ardipithecus ramidus Dentition. Science, 326(69):94–9 [Google Scholar]
  • McBrearty S, Jablonski NG (2005) First fossil chimpanzee. Nature, 437(7055):105–8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Horvath JE, Ramachandran GL, Fedrigo O, et al (2014) Genetic Comparisons Yield Insight into the Evolution of Enamel Thickness during Human Evolution. J Hum Evol 73:75–87 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.